Monday, May 26

Eeep!!

I don't really know what to say:

It's taken him a thousand years or so, but the Doctor has finally pulled. Yes, the Time Lord is getting a Time Lady...

In Saturday's episode the Doctor meets Professor River Song, played by the lovely Alex Kingston of ER and Moll Flanders fame.

River is an archaeologist from the 51st century and soon makes it clear that she's had a very close encounter with the Doctor in another time. A show source says: "The Doctor introduces himself to River Song, and it becomes clear they've been an item - but in the future."

Eventually romance blossoms and is actually played out over two episodes, reaching a climax (so to speak) next week.

In the past, the Doctor has flirted with his female sidekicks but despite the occasional peck on the cheek they've never gone the distance..

But this is obviously a match made in heaven - Professor Song has her own sonic screwdriver.

Taken from the Mirror...
Newspapers are never to be fully trusted.
OMGness!

82 comments:

  1. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    OMG!!! squeeeeee. no way! OMG! is she definatley a time lady?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I only know what the paper says.
    Tis madness!

    ReplyDelete
  3. from my blog...

    This leaves a lot of ideas we can speculate over, is River Song Romana a-la-Fob watch? (although this plot idea been used by both the Doctor and The Master already), perhaps River Song is a post-operative Captain Jack (I somehow doubt this lol), a post-regeneration Jenny but thats surely incest of a sort, or a regenerated Master?

    River Song has a sonic Screwdriver, I wonder if the Doctor gave her it in the future?

    And remember - Your song must end soon, could it mean time is being rewritten and she is to die?

    ReplyDelete
  4. btw it appears river song is human not timelord

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Hmmm... Sounds a little like Girl in the Fireplace. I'll wait and see if this is true, given the source. But, really, did we need the climax joke? I mean, ewwww...

    ReplyDelete
  6. As we found out in Partners In Crime, it doesn't take a Time Lord/Lady to own a sonic screwdriver.

    I'm not up on the Mirror much, (being American) but if it's a tabloid-like paper...I'll believe it when I see it, honestly.

    It just seems too odd from a writing standpoint to have this big "OMG ROSE IS COMING" scenario, and then dump some random romance on the Doctor right before it's about to happen.

    A short, one-shot, never going to last beyond this moment mutual attraction like in The Girl in the Fireplace, sure...but a romance that develops and blossoms over two whole episodes, making said romance pack that much more of a punch?

    That just seems like it would diminish the "Rose is coming back" story arc way too much to be real.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    As combom said, she isn't a true Time Lady. That's just the reporter playing on words.

    ReplyDelete
  8. From an earlier interview with Russell T Davis - we should listen to everything River Song says very, very, very carefully!

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    wowza, that doctor sure gets around, eh?

    but i love rose too much and wouldnt her return so be overshadowed by this supposed clandestine affair??!!!..in the very far future

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Moffat and his bleedin' love stories! I hope this isn't a sign of things to come.

    ReplyDelete
  11. but the doctor is a "people person", so why shouldnt he find a wife/spouse/mate/whatever?

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    River & the Doctor? When Rose is returning??????
    You are joking......

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    OMG NO!!!! has he forgotten everything he said to rose in doomsday??? men, honestly

    ReplyDelete
  14. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    has river song met the current regeneration? and with wibbly wobby timey wimeyness whos future have they met in? the doctors? whats the future to a man who travels in time?

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    I so hope this isn't true, it would bloody annoy me as Rose is returning. How can they bring her back after such an emotional Doomsday if the Doctor is "in love" with someone else. That would totally destroy all of the first and second series.

    ReplyDelete
  16. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    This seems to take away from the arc of the series, "She is returning" meaning Rose. And isn't the Doctor thrilled when Donna says, "Rose is coming back, no matter what's happening, isn't that good?" and he says "Yes." I dunno, this takes a lot away from the Rose theme, considering she'll be back in a few episodes.

    ReplyDelete
  17. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    What I think is interesting is the fact that Steve Moffat is one of the few Dr Who writers who actually considers time travel an important part of storytelling as opposed to a device simply to move the Doctor about. If River Song had met him in his future - apart from it being a bit Audrey Niffenegger - then surely that's a sign of an involved, intelligent SM script, and a good thing for it? It does add another paradox to the ongoing theme of predestination though.

    ReplyDelete
  18. dont blame the doctor, like all men, we are testosterone driven :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. "has river song met the current regeneration? and with wibbly wobby timey wimeyness whos future have they met in? the doctors? whats the future to a man who travels in time?"

    Recall "The Shakespeare Code." The Doctor meets Queen Elizabeth, who calls him her sworn enemy and sics her guards on him. When Martha asks him what he's done to offend the Queen, he replies that he doesn't know - he hasn't done it yet.

    ReplyDelete
  20. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Looks like they ran out of things to talk about so they returned to the good old let's make up some DW nonsense routine. (even though occasionaly they do tell the truth)

    ReplyDelete
  21. oh my god.
    this series is crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  22. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    I am with brigadier & n.t.

    A Steven Moffat script we are talking about guys. It's going to make sense.

    Having been a fan of The Moff for quite a while now, I can say that not only will it not be a cheap romance, but also that it will somehow connect with the story & add to the character of the Doctor.

    As for all you nay-sayers regarding "Rose is coming back" might I remind you that he fell for Madame Du Pompador when he was traveling with Rose! So it negates that argument.

    Besides, the Doctor is a Time Lord & his idea of "love" might be much different from the human idea of love.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well, it's only The Mirror saying it - it's not like it's official yet.

    ReplyDelete
  24. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Erm, has anyone ever read The Mirror? Not wanting to offend anyone but it usually is a load of rubbish

    ReplyDelete
  25. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Is it that unlikely the Mirror would have seen a preview tape for the episode? I wouldn't be surprised if this was true - it's a very Moffat sort of thing to do, just look at Blink and The Girl In The Fireplace - the latter having happened right in the middle of the Doctor and Rose falling in love, remember? I think I heard that Moffat likes his scripts to stand relatively alone from series arcs. And, like Elizabeth I in The Shakespeare Code, it's something for him to pick up on in Series 5. This also creates a kind of time paradox - who fell in love first, the Doctor or River Song? From his perspective, it's her, but from her perspective, it might well have been him.

    ReplyDelete
  26. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Erm, this may be just me being thick, but how would River Song know that they'd had a relationship if it was in the future?
    This wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff makes my head hurt.

    ReplyDelete
  27. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    uch...my head hurts.

    ReplyDelete
  28. "Erm, this may be just me being thick, but how would River Song know that they'd had a relationship if it was in the future?
    This wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff makes my head hurt."

    I'm not sure this is right, but I'll take a stab: Her past is his future, so the first time he meets her is the second time she meets him, and vice versa.

    ReplyDelete
  29. what?? WHAT?!

    no no no no

    ReplyDelete
  30. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    do not want this. AT ALL!

    Really. I hope that the Daily Mail are just being stupid again.

    It's pointless to plonk this in the middle of "Rose is returning".

    Because. It's Rose we're talking about!

    ReplyDelete
  31. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    hmmm i think the mail is telling porky pies..

    just doesn't seem like a credible story line to me...

    ReplyDelete
  32. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Hm, Stephen Moffat likes his story to be stand-alones, but he's got to know about Rose's return. It's possible that it's their way of Rose and Doctor saying good-bye to each other (what with other rumors that she's dating someone in Pete's world). But then why bring her back at all? Just assume she's moving on and so will the Doctor.

    Again, if it's true, I'll trust Stephen Moffat to weave a great story.

    It'll be funny though, if nothing even remotely close will happen in this story :)

    ReplyDelete
  33. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Just replying to a quick comment that someone made about the Doc falling for Reinette. I wouldn't say he fell inlove with her. I think he respected the hell out of her, and he had a major crush, and he cared for her, but LOVE? I doubt it ever got that far for him.

    I trust Moffat with the script, and I'm sure they will be tremendous episodes (his eps are always my favorites) I just think this plot sounds a bit odd.

    ReplyDelete
  34. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Another Rani fakeout, maybe. All of this sonic technology keeps showing up. Hrm.

    ReplyDelete
  35. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    I'm lost. I don't get it? So it's the Doctor's love from the future?

    ReplyDelete
  36. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    So, I wonder if Doctor meets her in his future timeline (say when he's 1300 years old), where is he in HER present time line? I mean, why is he not there with her? (That would be another future reincarnation possibly). Is he staying at home or he's traveling - she's doing something else kind of thing?
    (Assuming this story is true :)

    ReplyDelete
  37. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    RTD says:
    "This episode focuses on spoilers a lot.Watch River Song, and listen to her every word, VERY carefully".

    Doesn't this mean that River Song is basically a walking-talking-spoiler-machine? It hints that she will says a lot of things (and DO a lot of things) that, if we look closely enough, will foreshadow, or hint at, what is to come from finale/Xmas/Specials.

    Me like her now. Me like anyone who gives me spoileresss! (Jess, for a start!)

    ReplyDelete
  38. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    Oh gosh no.
    That's all I have to say.

    ReplyDelete
  39. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    I seriously doubt it. Something like that would create a paradox, and that kind of thing is generally frowned upon by the Doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  40. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    If this happens, I'll be eternally pissed off with Doctor Who.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I really don't see what the problem is. As far as he knows, Rose is out of the picture... and I loved Girl in the Fireplace, even though he was with Rose during that episode. Chill out! :-P

    ReplyDelete
  42. AnonymousMay 26, 2008

    I know exactly what to say: Do. Not. Want.
    And that's nothing to do with Rose. The Doctor + love affairs = out of character.

    I hope the Mirror just took some scraps and pulled them out of context, as it happened so often before.

    ReplyDelete
  43. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    I also remember reading somewhere (DWM ?) that the role of River Song couldn't be just played by anybody, they wanted someone good and somewhat famous, so probably implies some significance to the character! Doesn't have to mean love affair, could be she's important in other espects.

    But I agree with n.t. don't stress out! I'm sure it'll all be sorted in a great way!

    ReplyDelete
  44. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    That picture that could be davros - I lightened it using Photoshop just to see what it looked like . .
    http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/
    a129/blackimare/Random/Untitled-4.jpg

    Looks more like a really tall Dalek or prehaps the red one more then Davros . .
    And unless its just my program doing that . . Slitheen?

    ReplyDelete
  45. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    So agree with Vali. Do not want.

    ReplyDelete
  46. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO he's supposed to end up with Rose :(

    ReplyDelete
  47. I'm sorry but I just don't see it.

    I mean, I remember what he was like with Madam de Pompadour. He may act the same way with River Song but I don't think anything will come of it.

    And I side with n.t. as well. It's a Moffat story and everything WILL get sorted.

    ReplyDelete
  48. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    I think I may heave.

    If they make this woman the Doctor's future girlfriend, I may have to kill Moffat.

    If he negates everyhing the Doctor and Rose were to each other by saying "Oh you'll love this girl more", I may have to kill Moffat.

    If they bring Rose back only to further break the Doctor and Rose's hearts I may have to kill RTD.

    And if they bring her back only to break them up because The Doc has a wandering eye, and Rose has a boyfriend I may have to kill RTD.

    Because if they did all those things, (from a Rose/Doc fan point of view) there would be no point in her returning at all, and I would actually prefer she didn't.

    ReplyDelete
  49. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    lol wut.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I still maintain that it's all hogwash. Steven's a better writer than that, and Russell would NOT put up with someone putting a huge romance in a few episodes before Rose is returning. He was way too fond of the Rose character to let her be overshadowed by another love story.

    And, besides, if she's met him before in her past/his future...why does she introduce herself? Unless she's from far enough in the future that she had a relationship with the future 11th Doctor and doesn't recognize this face, she'd know him. Which I highly doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  51. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    "There's not only the threat in the shadows, but there's also the Doctor's mysterious connection to one of the explorers."

    From Lizo's review on newsround.Oh Dear.

    ReplyDelete
  52. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    "And, besides, if she's met him before in her past/his future...why does she introduce herself?"

    Because she knows from having met the Doctor before in her past that their meeting in the library wouldn't happen until his past - and so he wouldn't know her. She's trying not to cause a time paradox by giving away that they meet in his future. Alternatively, as noted, she might have known a future regeneration of the Doctor, and thus would not recognise him at first.

    ReplyDelete
  53. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    I really hope that Steven Moffat puts an end to this constant need to sexualize the Doctor in one uncommital way or another. Yes, a little personal intrigue and emotion makes for good tv, but a daughter, kissing companions at every other episode.. let it go already.


    RTD clearly had a crush on The Doctor as a 10 year old and can't get over it. You know it's true.

    ReplyDelete
  54. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    I'm hoping that if he does have some sort of relationship with her, they got it backwards and instead of being with Future-Doctor it is with a previous Doctor. I think that would be much better.

    ReplyDelete
  55. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    Sorry Rose fans, what do you think is going to happen? They won’t settle down and have time babies & live happily ever after, this is DR Who after alll! Hasn’t it been reported Rose has a boyfriend anyway??

    ReplyDelete
  56. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    have you seen the latest doctor who trailor?

    think it appeared on the bbc website this morning...

    have a look.. makes this story seem all the more likely

    "hello sweetie"

    ReplyDelete
  57. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    fear factor is up as well!

    ReplyDelete
  58. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    Anonymous said...
    I think I may heave.


    awwwww, thats cute, i think some-one needs to get out more.
    personally i see the whole thing as stupid little teenage crushes, eg Rose was bored with her life and suddenly with the dr everything is new and exciting and nothing is the same, she infact fancies this.
    while the dr's feelings were jus due to the fact after many years of wandering alone he finally had some-one, and only had stronger feelings due to Rose having strong feelings for him- you know you dont fancy someone untill maybe you know they fancy you, and then you start looking at them in a different light.....its happened to me before.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Can I just say that I hope it's not as...gross...as the Mirror article? I always liked the understatement in the show...I really do not want to hear about the Doctor "going the distance." Yuck.

    Also I'm inclined to think that if they have something going on she will die by the end of "Forest of the Dead." Because regardless of what the plot is, they will still want to clear the decks for Rose. Also..."Your song must end soon"...just a thought.

    Now that I'm getting over my initial WHATness, I'm inclined to agree with others - Moffat will make it work.

    ReplyDelete
  60. there seems to be a lot of "rose is coming back so how can he do this", in regard to river song. but i get the impression ppl are thinking the dr is practically two timing rose (although his relationship with her appears to have been platonic). there could be decades or even century's between rose and river, its just time travel that makes things overlap!

    ReplyDelete
  61. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    Lets not get ourselves in a tizzy!!! just because they go out in the future does not mean the doctor will fancy river song now!!

    ReplyDelete
  62. >>there seems to be a lot of "rose is coming back so how can he do this", in regard to river song. but i get the impression ppl are thinking the dr is practically two timing rose (although his relationship with her appears to have been platonic).<<

    No...I just think from a writing perspective that this comes way too close to the big Rose reveal.

    It's not a matter of cheating, it's a matter of putting a huge romantic storyline in right before reopening ANOTHER romantic storyline. Especially with kids watching that could get easily confused by this. Hell, I'm fairly sure at the moment that *I'm* confused by this, and I'm 31!

    If this had happened, say, near the beginning of the series, or was a bit more minor, I'd have no problem with it, just like I had no problem with The Girl in the Fireplace. In fact I love that episode.

    Here's hoping the Mirror blew it up far more than it actually is, if it *does* happen. Considering that paper is a glorified tabloid as far as I've heard, I'll take it with a grain of salt.

    ReplyDelete
  63. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    I don't want her to be his Time-Lady. That spot is just for Rose - just minus the fact that she's human. I don't care about this River girl, Rose and the Doctor are perfect together. I'm a Rose and Doctor shipper.

    ReplyDelete
  64. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    I always thought Alex Kingston was quite fit, ever since she was in Moll Flanders.

    ReplyDelete
  65. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    It's not a matter of cheating, it's a matter of putting a huge romantic storyline in right before reopening ANOTHER romantic storyline.

    Rose isn't going to have a romantic storyline with The Doctor. She is going to have a boyfriend from her universe.

    ReplyDelete
  66. the doctor only ever saw rose as a good friend, even as a daughter, never as a lover, and YES rose loved the doctor

    ReplyDelete
  67. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    Um, well, Combom, apparently he was going to say 'I love you' at Doomsday.

    And I really don't think he saw her as a daughter.

    I mean, I have no problem with you thinking that, but even David Tennant thinks that they were in love.

    ReplyDelete
  68. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    Um, well, Combom, apparently he was going to say 'I love you' at Doomsday.

    And I really don't think he saw her as a daughter.

    I mean, I have no problem with you thinking that, but even David Tennant thinks that they were in love.

    ReplyDelete
  69. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    Yeah, you can't deny that the Doctor loved Rose. But neither of them knew they'd meet again. Similarly, as noted, the Doctor's romance with River Song in his future could take centuries to arrive. And as regards to a romantic story opening up in the finale episodes, I don't see there being any time for that.

    ReplyDelete
  70. AnonymousMay 27, 2008

    the doctor said in school reunion 'can you imagine seeing that happen to someone that you-' then rose said 'someone that you what, doctor?'
    he was SO gonna say love!!

    ReplyDelete
  71. >>
    Rose isn't going to have a romantic storyline with The Doctor. She is going to have a boyfriend from her universe.<<

    That's actually the first time I've heard of this. And with so many rumors flying, I'm going to stick to a wait and see policy on that.

    It would really be a kick in the teeth to a lot of fans if they did that.

    "I never though I'd see you again, Rose..."
    "Yeah, me either. I'm over you now, got a new boyfriend and everything. Sorry, hon. See ya!"

    *cringe* Though, it makes me wonder if they're letting rumors like this spread so we can all be completely surprised. Who knows.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I'm pretty sure she'll have a boyfriend - and it's not Mickey, what the heck! - but I doubt that'll get in the way. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  73. AnonymousMay 28, 2008

    if river song is human then their relationship wont be centuries later because river song would be dead

    ReplyDelete
  74. she is from 51st century, so the doctor could meet her in 1000 years from now!

    ReplyDelete
  75. AnonymousMay 28, 2008

    River Song is also a time-traveller, according to some reports, so their relationship being centuries later shouldn't be a problem. But even if she wasn't, it could be centuries later for the Doctor and say ten years ago for her.

    ReplyDelete
  76. AnonymousMay 28, 2008

    River Song is also a time-traveller, according to some reports, so their relationship being centuries later shouldn't be a problem. But even if she wasn't, it could be centuries later for the Doctor and say ten years ago for her.

    ReplyDelete
  77. AnonymousMay 28, 2008

    what dont people understand that 100s of years in the future is 100s of years in the dr's future, not river songs.

    Dr Future relationship at point of meeting.
    River Songs past at point of meeting.

    get it into your skulls.

    ReplyDelete
  78. OOOOOOOOO....if this is true...I will be VERY upset.
    VERY.

    ReplyDelete
  79. AnonymousMay 30, 2008

    This had better be a load of bull. Seriously, I'm going to scream if they make the Doctor go all sappy over this River Song only a few episodes before Rose (who he should OBVIOUSLY be with) returns. RTD, SM, if this happens, you will join my hit-list. But otherwise, I'm still looking forward to the episodes!

    ReplyDelete
  80. The doctor isn't going to go sappy over her yet. He doesn't know her. I think "your song must end" means she's going to die before she reveals too much.

    That would mean the doctor won't know how he met her, but it'll set us up for a new storyline later.

    With the recent success of Moffat's (amazing!) storylines it wouldn't surprise me if RTD decided to trust him with a more important storyline development...

    Basically I trust them to make this work. Best episode of the series.

    ReplyDelete
  81. in future river song hates the doctor that not of her

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.